Building a Science-First Ingredient Interpreter

 

TL;DR:

Translating Skincare Labels into Science-Backed Clarity
AI UX meets ingredient literacy, no fear, no fluff, just facts.

I’m leading UX and content design for an AI-powered skincare interpreter, built in collaboration with AI engineer Keon Sadatian. Together, we’re rethinking how ingredient data is explained, bridging the gap between raw chemical listings and everyday consumer understanding.


 
 
 

What’s New

  • Built a lightweight prototype to simulate how the AI assistant feels in a real interaction, focusing on tone, flow, and structure.

  • Used the prototype to communicate interaction intent with both my engineer and domain experts, bridging the gap between logic and user experience.

  • Identified key friction points in ChatGPT simulation: tone drift, overconfident answers, and prompt fatigue in multi-step logic.

View a deeper dive into the latest updates →

 
 

The Why:

The Problem

Ingredient lists are dense, inconsistent, and often wrapped in jargon or anxiety-inducing scores. Most tools offer little context and even less trust.

Our Solution

We’re building a system that turns any ingredient list into a clear, evidence-based breakdown, grounded in formulation science, readable by real humans, and structured for scalable GenAI.

Paste a product’s ingredient list → Get clear, contextual, evidence-based explanations.

We’re Building This Tool to…

  • Explaining each ingredient’s function in readable, accurate language

  • Providing context such as concentration, formulation type, and common usage

  • Avoiding moralizing or fear-based terminology

  • Offering credible references for deeper learning and transparency

  • Summarizing overall product composition (e.g., “4 humectants, 2 emollients”) for quick understanding

 

We don’t follow “clean beauty” scoring systems like EWG. Our approach is rooted in scientific evidence—not anxiety.

 

What We’re Exploring:

Ingredient Data Sources

We pull from trusted sources (INCI Decoder, CosIng) and emphasize reference-backed explanations over moralizing or marketing trends. Our aim? Insight, not influence.

UX Patterns

  • Ingredient-by-ingredient breakdowns for clarity and education

  • Summary views that highlight overall product structure (e.g., ingredient roles and distribution)

  • Reference links to support transparency, trust, and deeper exploration

AI Capabilities

  • GPT models decode INCI terms into calming, accurate language.

  • Contextual prompts surface safety thresholds and typical use cases.

  • Ingredient roles (e.g., humectant, exfoliant) and actions (e.g., hydration, brightening) are surfaced clearly.

Example Output

“Phenoxyethanol: A preservative that stops bacteria in water-based formulas. Usually well-tolerated, but may cause irritation at high levels (>1%). Often found in cleansers and moisturizers.”
See: PubChem, CIR Report

 
 

Collaboration and Role:

  • I lead UX flows, prompt design, and content system logic.

  • Keon builds the frontend/backend prototype using a local Ollama runtime, enabling tight feedback loops and privacy-safe iteration.

  • We co-design surfacing logic and trust cues, making sure every insight feels both grounded and empowering.

 

Phases:

Phase 1: Testing + Iteration (Current Phase)

  • Integrate with LLM or retrieval-augmented model

  • Conduct usability testing on language clarity and risk phrasing

  • Align outputs with accessibility and enterprise design systems

Phase 2: Testing + Iteration

  • Begin user testing with real ingredient lists

  • Test upload and paste workflows

  • Build a trust-feedback loop to guide future improvements

Future Plans

  • Layer in user profiles (e.g., acne-prone, sensitive skin, rosacea)

  • Enable “smart” questions (e.g., “Is this pregnancy safe?”)

  • Develop a Chrome extension for ingredient popovers while brows

Previous
Previous

The AI Brain Behind Ingredient Transparency